All posts
UX Research Topics
Podcasts
Field Guide
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
When they’re bad, they’re terrible. No matter your opinion on focus group studies, here’s the sure-fire way to screw them up.
Chaos, bias, conflict, and superficiality: Surely, these are the ingredients for insightful user research.
Focus groups can be a breeding ground for all of them.
Whether you love them or hate them, focus groups certainly have their uses—they’re useful tools for gathering qualitative insights into user perceptions, for instance—and many of their most frequently cited shortcomings can be overcome with good research planning and the right expectations.
But if you’re not interested in running effective UX research focus groups, you can employ a few simple, self-sabotaging strategies to guarantee that your focus group fails.
Below, you’ll find 6 best practices for designing the kind of focus group that will waste time and money, produce unreliable insights that don’t get used, and confirm stakeholders’ worst suspicions about qualitative user research.
As the saying goes, “give me six hours to chop down a tree and I’ll spend the first four binge-watching Squid Game with my cat.”
The most challenging part of designing any study is creating an effective UX research plan—so why not skip it?
Just roll up to your focus group on the day of with no notes, no understanding of your research goals or the problems you’re looking to solve, no interview questions prepared, and no tangible plan for how you’ll use your findings afterwards.
You’re smart enough, right? You can totally wing it.
Gender, personality, cultural background, socioeconomic status, and other personal characteristics are all wildcard variables that could throw off your research findings.
Cultural differences will probably cause awkward misunderstandings, and it's not your job to be culturally sensitive in your research anyway. Designing inclusive products is the product developer’s responsibility.
So when you’re recruiting participants for your focus group, try to find people who are eerily similar to each other, like those twins from The Shining. Ideally, the participant panel only comprises your friends and family.
* Note: You probably don’t need me to tell you this, but... This article is meant to be tongue-in-cheek. Please don’t take these words at face value—especially the bit about recruiting a non-diverse group of participants. Representation matters, and so does thoughtful research design.
Everyone knows that five people isn’t enough for a valid finding in qualitative research.
You have to talk to as many people as possible.
Book the biggest conference venue you can find. Blast invitations far and wide—the more the merrier! Call it a focus party. It doesn’t matter who shows up, as long as you fill the room. Remember in college how there was that one house known for throwing the biggest parties and they were always too crowded and loud and all you could think about was how much cleaning the place up in the morning would suck but then you realized they probably never did clean it up, not really? That’s the vibe you’re going for.
In the totally unlikely experience that people in your focus party contradict or fail to validate your very good preconceived notions, then you have to run the focus group again. Rinse and repeat until you’ve found participants who validate your hypothesis and prove you were right all along.
The loudest voice in the room is usually the right one. I mean, why else would they sound so confident?
Power dynamics play an important role in any group conversation. One obnoxious loudmouth will rise as the natural leader, while the more timid folks will defer to the majority opinion—often out of complacency, fear of conflict, or a lack of confidence in presenting their ideas.
Once you’ve identified the extraverted steamroller, tell them to stand up in front of the group and filibuster the rest of the conversation. If other participants try to talk, gently remind them that it’s rude to interrupt when others are speaking.
Anyone can moderate a focus group study. It’s not that hard.
Rather than waste your time and energy moderating, let the intern do it. Heck, get the engineering or sales intern to run your focus group. (This is called democratization of research.)
All they have to do to facilitate the conversation is:
Normally, we’d suggest you mix a variety of research methods to gain richer, more nuanced user insights.
Not for focus group studies, though.
You should be able to discover everything you need to know about your users from a focus group alone. If you can’t, you didn’t do it right.
… And that’s about it! Everything you need to know to conduct really, really bad focus group studies.
Focus groups get a bad rap.
Plagued by social phenomena like groupthink and personal bias, this oft-maligned method comes with fundamental challenges for researchers.
But before you’re swept away by the tide of focus group criticisms, know this: Focus groups are meant to uncover perceptions, not behaviors.
The real reason focus groups tend to fail is because researchers try to use them to answer the wrong questions, during the wrong stage in product development—so don’t toss this method out of your research toolbox just yet.
TL;DR tips for a good focus group study include:
Now that you know the worst-case scenario for focus groups, learn how to conduct a focus group that doesn’t suck.
Product Education Manager
Marketer, writer, poet. Lizzy likes hiking, people-watching, thrift shopping, learning and sharing ideas. Her happiest memory is sitting on the shore of Lake Champlain in the summer of 2020, eating a clementine.